Trust and governance

Editorial and Corrections Policy

How RK Academy selects sources, separates facts from judgment, reviews content and corrects material errors.

Fact and content review: 22 September 2026

Editorial and Corrections Policy
No hidden certaintyDynamic fees, dates and status are labelled for re-checking.

Responsible organisation

The R K Academy Editorial Team is responsible for the site’s public guides. This organisational byline does not invent individual credentials. Where a named specialist reviews content in future, their real role and relevant basis will be disclosed.

Source hierarchy

We prefer test owners, awarding bodies, universities, regulators and government services. Current programme and fee claims must link to the responsible source and include a review date. Competitor and media pages may help identify questions but are not copied or treated as primary proof.

Five-part value check

Each major guide must be localised for the intended Indian/Ahmedabad user, trace important facts, include a concrete worked case, add a reasoned judgment with limitations and identify the responsible organisation. Content that cannot meet those conditions is held from indexing, merged or retired.

AI and automation

Automation may assist structure, language review or technical checks. It is not accepted as evidence. Material claims require source verification and human editorial responsibility; mass-produced or lightly rephrased content is not publishable.

Corrections

Send the URL, disputed statement and supporting source to server@rkacademy.net. Material corrections update the page and review date. We do not change dates merely to make unchanged content appear fresh.

Commercial separation

Course enquiries may lead to paid services. Editorial pages still disclose uncertainties and alternative official sources. Advertising, sponsorship or affiliate relationships must be labelled and must not control factual conclusions.